День России - 12 июня. Патриотизм и Навальный т.3

Напомните плз

 

Что предлагают богоподобные "нейтральные" юзеры?

 

Например, за кого они голосовали раньше и за кого будут?

@@aac @@Baza_KAiF

Луи, а ты че от стаи пидорах отбился?

там лукасы кончились, страна нищает

Я че помню блять за кого я 5 лет назад голосовал?

мое лицо, когда ватаны и либерахи пытаются решить уравнение, не имеющее решения. и спорят +доказывают друг другу, что их решение правильное и единственное, а их оппоненты лохи и вообще ТУПЫЫЫЫЫЫЫЫЫЫЕ

Я че помню блять за кого я 5 лет назад голосовал?

так ты будешь озвучивать свой вариант или дальше фуфлом продолжишь срок мотать

мое лицо, когда ватаны и либерахи пытаются решить уравнение, не имеющее решения. и спорят +доказывают друг другу, что их решение правильное и единственное, а их оппоненты лохи и вообще ТУПЫЫЫЫЫЫЫЫЫЫЕ

А голосовал ты за кого и за кого будешь?

за жирека офк

 

Я че помню блять за кого я 5 лет назад голосовал?

так ты будешь озвучивать свой вариант или дальше фуфлом продолжишь срок мотать

 

Ну против всех, потому что могу.

 

А у либерах страна не разваливается?

так либерахи и говорят, страна разваливается, давайте попробуй сменить человека, под началом которого она к такому пришла? А что ты говоришь?

 

 

тока без хуйни типа "это путин виноват", я и не говорю, что это исключительно его "заслуга"

 

 

найдите в этом отрывке либерах и того же навального

 

 

А у либерах страна не разваливается?

так либерахи и говорят, страна разваливается, давайте попробуй сменить человека, под началом которого она к такому пришла? А что ты говоришь?

 

 

тока без хуйни типа "это путин виноват", я и не говорю, что это исключительно его "заслуга"

 

 

 

 

Вся суть борьбы за власть бай Орвелл

The aims of these three groups are entirely irreconcilable.

The aim of the High is to remain where they are. The

aim of the Middle is to change places with the High. The

aim of the Low, when they have an aim—for it is an abiding

characteristic of the Low that they are too much crushed

by drudgery to be more than intermittently conscious of

anything outside their daily lives—is to abolish all distinctions

and create a society in which all men shall be equal.

Thus throughout history a struggle which is the same in its

main outlines recurs over and over again. For long periods

the High seem to be securely in power, but sooner or later

there always comes a moment when they lose either their

belief in themselves or their capacity to govern efficiently,

or both. They are then overthrown by the Middle, who enlist

the Low on their side by pretending to them that they

are fighting for liberty and justice. As soon as they have

reached their objective, the Middle thrust the Low back

into their old position of servitude, and themselves become

the High. Presently a new Middle group splits off from one

of the other groups, or from both of them, and the struggle

begins over again. Of the three groups, only the Low are

never even temporarily successful in achieving their aims.

It would be an exaggeration to say that throughout history

there has been no progress of a material kind. Even today,

in a period of decline, the average human being is physically

better off than he was a few centuries ago. But no advance

in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution

has ever brought human equality a millimetre nearer.

From the point of view of the Low, no historic change has

ever meant much more than a change in the name of their

masters

 

найдите в этом отрывке либерах и того же навального

 

уже бежим переводить

блядыч ты че ахуел?

тут порядочные либераны собрались

а книжки + англ яз для быдла

 

 

 

А у либерах страна не разваливается?

так либерахи и говорят, страна разваливается, давайте попробуй сменить человека, под началом которого она к такому пришла? А что ты говоришь?

 

 

тока без хуйни типа "это путин виноват", я и не говорю, что это исключительно его "заслуга"

 

 

 

 

Вся суть борьбы за власть бай Орвелл

The aims of these three groups are entirely irreconcilable.

The aim of the High is to remain where they are. The

aim of the Middle is to change places with the High. The

aim of the Low, when they have an aim—for it is an abiding

characteristic of the Low that they are too much crushed

by drudgery to be more than intermittently conscious of

anything outside their daily lives—is to abolish all distinctions

and create a society in which all men shall be equal.

Thus throughout history a struggle which is the same in its

main outlines recurs over and over again. For long periods

the High seem to be securely in power, but sooner or later

there always comes a moment when they lose either their

belief in themselves or their capacity to govern efficiently,

or both. They are then overthrown by the Middle, who enlist

the Low on their side by pretending to them that they

are fighting for liberty and justice. As soon as they have

reached their objective, the Middle thrust the Low back

into their old position of servitude, and themselves become

the High. Presently a new Middle group splits off from one

of the other groups, or from both of them, and the struggle

begins over again. Of the three groups, only the Low are

never even temporarily successful in achieving their aims.

It would be an exaggeration to say that throughout history

there has been no progress of a material kind. Even today,

in a period of decline, the average human being is physically

better off than he was a few centuries ago. But no advance

in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution

has ever brought human equality a millimetre nearer.

From the point of view of the Low, no historic change has

ever meant much more than a change in the name of their

masters

 

найдите в этом отрывке либерах и того же навального

 

 

уже бежим переводить

 

 

 

А у либерах страна не разваливается?

так либерахи и говорят, страна разваливается, давайте попробуй сменить человека, под началом которого она к такому пришла? А что ты говоришь?

 

 

тока без хуйни типа "это путин виноват", я и не говорю, что это исключительно его "заслуга"

 

 

 

 

Вся суть борьбы за власть бай Орвелл

The aims of these three groups are entirely irreconcilable.

The aim of the High is to remain where they are. The

aim of the Middle is to change places with the High. The

aim of the Low, when they have an aim—for it is an abiding

characteristic of the Low that they are too much crushed

by drudgery to be more than intermittently conscious of

anything outside their daily lives—is to abolish all distinctions

and create a society in which all men shall be equal.

Thus throughout history a struggle which is the same in its

main outlines recurs over and over again. For long periods

the High seem to be securely in power, but sooner or later

there always comes a moment when they lose either their

belief in themselves or their capacity to govern efficiently,

or both. They are then overthrown by the Middle, who enlist

the Low on their side by pretending to them that they

are fighting for liberty and justice. As soon as they have

reached their objective, the Middle thrust the Low back

into their old position of servitude, and themselves become

the High. Presently a new Middle group splits off from one

of the other groups, or from both of them, and the struggle

begins over again. Of the three groups, only the Low are

never even temporarily successful in achieving their aims.

It would be an exaggeration to say that throughout history

there has been no progress of a material kind. Even today,

in a period of decline, the average human being is physically

better off than he was a few centuries ago. But no advance

in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution

has ever brought human equality a millimetre nearer.

From the point of view of the Low, no historic change has

ever meant much more than a change in the name of their

masters

 

найдите в этом отрывке либерах и того же навального

 

Это применимо и к Путину на первом сроке его правления. 

 

 

А у либерах страна не разваливается?

так либерахи и говорят, страна разваливается, давайте попробуй сменить человека, под началом которого она к такому пришла? А что ты говоришь?

 

 

тока без хуйни типа "это путин виноват", я и не говорю, что это исключительно его "заслуга"

 

 

 

 

Вся суть борьбы за власть бай Орвелл

The aims of these three groups are entirely irreconcilable.

The aim of the High is to remain where they are. The

aim of the Middle is to change places with the High. The

aim of the Low, when they have an aim—for it is an abiding

characteristic of the Low that they are too much crushed

by drudgery to be more than intermittently conscious of

anything outside their daily lives—is to abolish all distinctions

and create a society in which all men shall be equal.

Thus throughout history a struggle which is the same in its

main outlines recurs over and over again. For long periods

the High seem to be securely in power, but sooner or later

there always comes a moment when they lose either their

belief in themselves or their capacity to govern efficiently,

or both. They are then overthrown by the Middle, who enlist

the Low on their side by pretending to them that they

are fighting for liberty and justice. As soon as they have

reached their objective, the Middle thrust the Low back

into their old position of servitude, and themselves become

the High. Presently a new Middle group splits off from one

of the other groups, or from both of them, and the struggle

begins over again. Of the three groups, only the Low are

never even temporarily successful in achieving their aims.

It would be an exaggeration to say that throughout history

there has been no progress of a material kind. Even today,

in a period of decline, the average human being is physically

better off than he was a few centuries ago. But no advance

in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution

has ever brought human equality a millimetre nearer.

From the point of view of the Low, no historic change has

ever meant much more than a change in the name of their

masters

 

найдите в этом отрывке либерах и того же навального

 

че еще будет, атлант расправил плечи?

ты понял этот отрывок как то, что высших не надо менять?

врети все

орувел этот ваш крымлевский пропагандон

щас бы с художественной литературы брать проекцию на реальность

всегда поражало как pidarasy из мудрых историй о том, что власть говно, делают выводы, что власть менять не надо

да вам нихуя сложнее чака пулоника в руки давать нельзя

а булкакова можно?

 

 

 

А у либерах страна не разваливается?

так либерахи и говорят, страна разваливается, давайте попробуй сменить человека, под началом которого она к такому пришла? А что ты говоришь?

 

 

тока без хуйни типа "это путин виноват", я и не говорю, что это исключительно его "заслуга"

 

 

 

 

Вся суть борьбы за власть бай Орвелл

The aims of these three groups are entirely irreconcilable.

The aim of the High is to remain where they are. The

aim of the Middle is to change places with the High. The

aim of the Low, when they have an aim—for it is an abiding

characteristic of the Low that they are too much crushed

by drudgery to be more than intermittently conscious of

anything outside their daily lives—is to abolish all distinctions

and create a society in which all men shall be equal.

Thus throughout history a struggle which is the same in its

main outlines recurs over and over again. For long periods

the High seem to be securely in power, but sooner or later

there always comes a moment when they lose either their

belief in themselves or their capacity to govern efficiently,

or both. They are then overthrown by the Middle, who enlist

the Low on their side by pretending to them that they

are fighting for liberty and justice. As soon as they have

reached their objective, the Middle thrust the Low back

into their old position of servitude, and themselves become

the High. Presently a new Middle group splits off from one

of the other groups, or from both of them, and the struggle

begins over again. Of the three groups, only the Low are

never even temporarily successful in achieving their aims.

It would be an exaggeration to say that throughout history

there has been no progress of a material kind. Even today,

in a period of decline, the average human being is physically

better off than he was a few centuries ago. But no advance

in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution

has ever brought human equality a millimetre nearer.

From the point of view of the Low, no historic change has

ever meant much more than a change in the name of their

masters

 

найдите в этом отрывке либерах и того же навального

 

че еще будет, атлант расправил плечи?

 

ты понял этот отрывок как то, что высших не надо менять?

 

меня забавляет что один даун скинул цитату другого древнего дауна и я на нее видимо должен молится потому что древние люди явно были пиздецки умнее современных

очередная философская хуета а-ля "мы все все равно умрем тык нахуй че то потеть"

видимо нужен гуманитарный склад ума чтобы верить в такую хуету

На выборы не ходил ни разу.

Хотя не, один раз пошел, но опоздал на избирательный участок)))